Reaping what you sow
Now that impossible-to-attain deadlines are approaching and people are talking about putting a further burden on cash-strapped state coffers to pay for so-called ” emissions reduction credits,” even Japan is starting to have second thoughts about how to implement the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. The government keeps coming up with various plans, but they are rightfully shying away from imposing a “carbon tax” on an economy for which flat-lining is considered to be a positive development.
Though Japan is obliged to curb its greenhouse gas emissions by 6% from the 1990 level by 2012 under Kyoto, emissions in fiscal 2002 were 7.6% higher than in 1990. Japan’s Environment Ministry originally said that a carbon tax is required in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the government’s final plan merely called for discussion of a tax “in a serious and comprehensive manner.”
However, Environment Minister Yuriko Koike (who, apparently, is qualified for her job based on a BA in Sociology from Cairo University and a stint as an economic newsreader babe on a Tokyo TV station) says she still believes that taxing people into submission is an effective way to fight global warming. “We want to continue our discussions and aim to introduce the levy in fiscal 2006,” she said.
As long as they are picking unqualified women named Koike, I nominate Eiko.
March 31st, 2005 at 9:28 pmKyoto has been an unmitigated disaster. Earlier this month, Canada doubled their projection of the expected cost of compliance, this only 2 years after coming up with the original budget. Will it double again in two more years?
March 31st, 2005 at 10:15 pmGaijinBiker: I nominate Eiko.
I second that nomination!
April 1st, 2005 at 1:43 amYou know what, I hate environmentalists but I think every Kyoto signing country should carbon tax their economies because:
1) it would seriously harm them and make the US economy look better by comparison
2) I want to see the look on the faces of environmentalists as they get utterly discredited.
Of course, we all know the Kyoto Treaty will not be enforced. Sure some smaller countries may abide, but the big countries will not. It will end up like the Stability and Growth Pact in the EU which France and Germany regularly violate and then use their control of the Commission to veto any punishment. Say, those 2 economies are running at over 10% structural unemployment, so how are they gonna follow Kyoto anyway????
April 1st, 2005 at 1:51 amIt’s not possible to comply with Kyoto, unless drastic measures are taken. Remember, things have to revert to 1990 levels while the population continues to increase.
An article in a Canadian newspaper used Canadian government statistics to show that for Canada to comply with Kyoto, it would have to either eliminate all domestic air travel, or take a step of similar significance.
April 2nd, 2005 at 9:56 am