Japanese saviors
08/17/2005 @ 3:00 am
Click here to view scans of Japanese WWII propaganda that was intended to show readers how much better off they would be by exchanging their European colonial masters for Asian colonial masters.
As I always say… When you’ve got a jackboot to your neck, it really makes no difference whose foot is inside it!
Thanks to Mr. Pink.

Yeah and I don’t remember the British or the Americans committing systematic rape and murder.
August 17th, 2005 at 3:01 amYeah and I don’t remember the British or the Americans committing systematic rape and murder.
I assume you’re being sarcastic…but it’s not like Singapore and Hong Kong were particularly blessed after the Japanese ousted the white devils…
August 17th, 2005 at 4:15 amWar is Hell.
In war you get the “Camping Effect” magnified. The Camping Effect is the male barbarity that occurs when a group of guys goes camping together. The pull my finger jokes abound, the “Pass the f#$#! Ketchup” etc. Does that make it right? No, absolutely not. But the standard propagation machines, the enemy isn’t human, patriatic fervor don’t help.
While I don’t think the US was a major human rights violator in WWII, the victor writes the history.
August 17th, 2005 at 6:44 amI was not being sarcastic. Human rights violator or not, the US and the UK never had systematic rape or murder. Can you name one incident? The US and UK never had their soldiers to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians and neither the US nor UK set up government sponsored rape houses.
August 17th, 2005 at 6:59 amDid Britain ever do anything like the Sook Ching massacre to Singapore? The Japanese killed more people in one weekend in Singapore than the British did in their entire colonial history, one quarter of the globe included.
How about the manila massacre? Did the Americans ever kill that many Filipinos? and Nanking makes those two like like minor incidents.
I was not being sarcastic. Human rights violator or not, the US and the UK never had systematic rape or murder. Can you name one incident? The US and UK never had their soldiers to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians and neither the US nor UK set up government sponsored rape houses.
August 17th, 2005 at 6:59 amDid Britain ever do anything like the Sook Ching massacre to Singapore? The Japanese killed more people in one weekend in Singapore than the British did in their entire colonial history, one quarter of the globe included.
How about the manila massacre? Did the Americans ever kill that many Filipinos? and Nanking makes those two look like minor incidents.
I’ve seen interviews with grizzled old Japanese vets and they mostly do admit that the Allies had much more respect for human life, their own to be sure but also that of the enemy and certainly native populations.. The bit about survivors writing history might’ve been true had the Japanese won but as it turned out in the western world history gets written by journalists and not governments, and none of what’s been written is disputable as far as I can tell (aside from the sparring about whether or not it was right to drop the nukes and the like) – instances of yellow journalism(which do clear up with time and a little hindsight) nonwithstanding.
August 17th, 2005 at 7:57 am“As I always say… When you’ve got a jackboot to your neck, it really makes no difference whose foot is inside it!”
Again, I think Japanese people still are missing the point. It does make a difference whose “foot is inside it”. When Japan occupy another nation, they pillage, rape, kill (innocent civilians), and do human experimentation for biological weapons. When US occupied Japan or other nations, incidents rarely happen. Japan to asians are like Germans to Jews.
August 17th, 2005 at 8:09 amI was not being sarcastic. Human rights violator or not, the US and the UK never had systematic rape or murder. Can you name one incident? The US and UK never had their soldiers to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians and neither the US nor UK set up government sponsored rape houses.
Did Britain ever do anything like the Sook Ching massacre to Singapore? The Japanese killed more people in one weekend in Singapore than the British did in their entire colonial history, one quarter of the globe included.
How about the manila massacre? Did the Americans ever kill that many Filipinos? and Nanking makes those two look like minor incidents.
Point taken.
August 17th, 2005 at 8:10 amRE: Andrew’s claim that the US and UK have not committed “systematic rape or murder.” The first European settlers on the continent now known as America killed and abused the native inhabitants. After the founding of the United States, African people were kidnapped or bought and enslaved as laborers mainly in the Southern States. It is not known how many slaves were raped and/or murdered, but systematic, institutionalized abuse of one race by another –including murder and rape — is a fact of US history. The UK has a history of abuse and physical violence in Burma and especially India, both part of the former British Raj. Interested readers are referred to a Wikipedia entry on the subject at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_India. The United States military killed civilians routinely in Vietnam since it was often difficult to determine who was a military target and who was a civilian. Entire villages were destroyed and the villagers killed as a matter of military strategy. Napalm was widely used, and caused great environmental damage and loss of life. These are simply the most obvious examples of mass killings and violence, including mass and/or institutionalized rape that one can find in the history of the US and the UK.
August 18th, 2005 at 1:39 pmDoes you know?
For instance, Britain killed the king in Burma. Afterwards, Burma was made to bring Burma Chinese and the Indian and to be ruled.
Even the educational opportunity was deprived, it was ruled by man of another country, and the raw labor was forced on the Burman.
The majority of Indonesian people from whom it was deprived of the education were not able to read the character in the age of colonialization.
They were slaves engaged only in simple work.
The same rule was done, and a lot of lives were lost also in Vietnam and India and countries of a lot of other Asia.
The independence movement person was restrained, and isolated to a very bad accommodation place.
Black’s old slave etc. are similar.
It was repeated until the opposition force in the colony disappeared by suppression.
When the opposition force disappears and the public peace is steady, it seems to have been improved a little.
However, it was not permitted to participate in politics of course.
At that time, the nation of colored races to be independent without receiving the colonialization such as the United States and Britain was only a Japanese empire and Kingdom of Thailand.
Are the American and the British really innocent?
Was rule right?
It is said that the Japanese ruled Asia in the Pacific War.
It is true.
However, what is the thing that the Japanese left in Asia?
Is it only destruction and a slaughter?
No.
The school was established for the Asian.
It constructed a road, the bridge was built, and the railway track was constructed.
However, when the war ended, these facilities were destroyed by the United States and
Britain why.
Only 40 kilos only remain in Kingdom of Thailand now though the railway was constructed
415 kilos in the total length.
At that time, Secretary of State Cordell Hull in the United States said.
“Even if it is defeated at the war, Japan might leave the influence as a soldier
who liberates Asia. ”
The destruction of such facilities will be a thing to advertise the
August 18th, 2005 at 2:33 pmjustice in the union country.
Why did the union country destroy the road, the railway, and the school
that Japan had constructed in Asia?
Will you feel the doubt?
It is said that Japan tried to invade, and to enslave Asia.
Is it true?
Japan established military forces by the Asian in Indonesia and Burma.
Arms were given to Indonesian people and the soldier was trained.
If you are a dictator, is how to shoot the gun taught the slave?
Is the means to make it revolt purposely taught?
Why did the Japanese teach the Asian how to shoot the gun?
Will you feel the doubt?
Of course, the Asian who testifies to Japanese soldier’s atrocity
exists, too.
However, in what country will man be the Asian?
It is Chinese.
It is usually Chinese Asian that testifies to the atrocity of Japan.
Chinese was doing business exclusively among Britain and Asians.
However, the privilege was deprived when Japan came to Asia.
The chance of the right and business that took the reins of
government divided into the Asian and was given.
Chinese from whom it is unfrocked has a grudge against the Japanese.
Therefore, it became a guerrilla.
Therefore, it was advertised that Japan had done the atrocity.
And, the American and the British used it.
The slaughter of a Japanese army was advertised by the U.S.Army in Palau.
However, it was never believed by the people of Palau.
It is because the elderly persons of Palau prove, “The Japanese did not do such a
thing”.
The road, the bridge, the school, and the field were destroyed by the U.S.Army as
for Palau.
The national flag of Palau is like to the national flag of Japan.
It is why.
Because it made it referring to the national flag of Japan.
Why is such a national flag adopted by the Palau that the United States advertises
that the slaughter was done?
The national flag hoisting is done at Independence Day of Indonesia.
An Indonesian national flag is executed by three men and women.
The man and woman and another person who put on the ethnic costume
are men who put on the service uniform of a Japanese empire.
Has the meaning been considered?
August 18th, 2005 at 2:33 pmAre the United States and Britain absolute justices?
Is Japan absolute evil?
Do you know?
The U.S.Army landed on Japan when the Pacific War ended.
Then, do you know what occurred?
30,000 of record rape events to a Japanese woman by soldier the United States exist.
However, a woman at that time thought the character and conduct doing was done with men other than the husband in contradiction to ethics.
Therefore, there is an opinion that the figure of 30,000 is too fewer than an actual abortion number.
The abortion did and was illegal in Japan at that time in contradiction to ethics.
However, there were too a lot of rapes of soldier the United States and a lot of women who got pregnant were generated.
They had an abortion by an unlawful doctor and committed suicide feeling the death by the infectious disease, and the rape shame.
Because damage was too large, Japanese Government at that time legalized the abortion.
It made an effort to defend woman’s life even if ethics that had continued for hundreds of years were disregarded.
It is being called “Yuusei hogo hou” now.
It is said that a Japanese soldier raped in Asia.
However, the mixed blood with the Japanese hardly exists why.
It exists slightly.
However, it is called a case to fall in love with the person who marries the Japanese and the Japanese.
Why does not the mixed blood with the Japanese exist in Asia though there was damage, that is, 30,000 people by soldier United States’s rape in Japan?
Did a systematic rape by the Japanese exist really?
Isn’t it an advertisement of Allied Forces?
Or, after it had worn a safe when raping, did a Japanese soldier rape?
The request of the United States was received, and the South Korean
participated in the Vietnam war.
The number of soldiers of South Korea is 100,000 people.
Then, the South Korean raped, did Vietnamese people, and slaughtered
it.
As a result, 10,000 mixed bloods were born.
This becomes an object of public concern in Vietnam.
If the rape exists, it is natural that the child is born.
However, why does not the mixed blood with a Japanese soldier exist?
It hears it again.
Are the United States and Britain the justices?
Is a Japanese empire at that time axis of evil that should be really
hated?
Is the Asia rule lasting for 400 years by the United States and
Europe correct?
“Neither the United States nor Britain suppressed, did not rule, and
August 18th, 2005 at 2:34 pmslaughtered it. ”
Can you say the same thing in front of Indonesia, Myanmar, and Asian’s
people?
Oh come on.. We’re talking relatively modern history here, WWII and general vicinity. Noone’s denying the atrocities committed by the Brits and other Europeans during the colonial era, but aside from a few incidents of stupidity nonwithstanding there just is no comparison between Japanese and western allied conduct during WWII, and that’s kinda the point – the West has accepted their share of responsibility for past conduct while a lot of Japanese still cling to the view that this just didn’t happen.
Mercy, your point about the Japanese building infrastructure is kinda pointless, that’s a typical colonialist excuse – the Europeans did this all over the world and actually invented it. Vietnam doesn’t compare either, say what you will about whether or not the war was right to be fought the U.S. made it a point to minimize civilian casualties, and it sure wasn’t the U.S. Army executing the village elders or every other man or whatever it was because of contacts with the enemy. (We burned down villages maybe to deny it to the VC, but with the population always safeguarded.) You can blame the French and the British commander there at the end of the war for rearming the remnants of the Japanese garrison to suppress the locals, which was a pretty strange situation.
The U.S. isn’t perfect, we all know how long the exploitaition of African-Americans lasted here, and neither are the Brits with the whole concentration camp thing in SA or the Raj massacres among other things, but at least the West owned up to their mistakes and isn’t trying to rationalize them.
August 19th, 2005 at 12:08 amHello,Duo.
I can understand your thought. However, there is misunderstanding.
You said an excuse of a scholar of typical colony principles. But the Europe and the American Asian rule were different from Japan.
Do you know it?
In 1941, Japan ruled Korea and Taiwan and Manchurian in China. Korea and Taiwan took the Japanese rule, and 40 passed then, too. Japan developed the heavy industries in Korea and Taiwan during 40 years. The Japanese government built a large-sized factory in Asia, and the world’s greatest hydroelectric power station was established in those days by Korea, too.
Where world the country which developed the heavy industries in a colony || there is not it.
It is only Japan.
High education is necessary to administer the heavy industries. Japan gave a Korean and a Taiwanese education the same as a Japanese. Therefore the Asian was able to administer the heavy industries.
In addition, they had franchise. In an electoral district of Japanese Tokyo, two Diet members of a Korean are elected. Administrative important work was given. There was an Asian promoted to a lieutenant general of Japanese empire Army. There is the soldier who received the best decoration. This fact was written down for an official record as well as the news.
Will this be a colony and the same thing which Europe and U.S.A. insist on?
Was the Indian able to run for a Diet member in the U.K.?
Was the Filipino able to become an officer named a lieutenant general in U.S.A.?
The Asian may have been a slave for an American, but Asia was a countryman for Japan. Therefore the heavy industries developed it and gave high education and accepted franchise.
Will this be a colony?
I cannot think so.
Japan and Asia were equal in those days.
Unfortunately such a fact is known in neither Europe nor U.S.A.
August 19th, 2005 at 1:43 amOn the contrary, I do not know most of the facts because even a Japanese took postwar masochistic education.
If a Japanese is cruel, it is publicized.
I am very sad.
Dear Mercy,
Your Burmese history is a little interesting. After all, you are leaving out how the Burmese kings had invaded Siam (now Thailand) as well as were conquering lands near India and expanding their territory. There’s a reason why Siamese forces joined with British forces in the wars that overthrew the Burmese king. Note that Siam remained independent.
I don’t deny that European countries engaged in warfare and imperialism against Asian countries. Please don’t whitewash the actions of Asian nations against other Asian nations, though.
August 19th, 2005 at 2:07 amThank you for response,John Thacker.
I do not intend to support aggression. Japan and Germany surely caused war. The war generated much sacrifice. It is a fact.
I’m sorry.
I cannot understand English well.
If I make a wrong remark, I apologize.
I am lacking in study about war done between Burma and the Kingdom of Thailand.
However, do you accept that the U.K. made Burma a colony?
Please imagine it in your situation.
Your country fought against a neighboring country. Russia occupied your country then in cooperation with a neighboring country. Russia brought a Chinese in your country and let only Chinese rule over inhabitants of your country which occupied the majority. You were robbed of an opportunity, franchise to take property, education, and you were to finish life by simple labor.
When such situation occurred, can you bear it?
A thing the same as this occurred in Burma.
It is a problem of the two countries that the Kingdom of Thailand fought against Burma, and it is not a British problem.
August 19th, 2005 at 3:40 amI cannot think that it is justified by the reason of Burma and Thai war.
We’re not trying to justify European colonialism or imperialism, Mercy. You seem to be taking things from a racial perspective essentially saying a fellow Asian opressor, no matter how brutal, will always be preferrable to a European one. I’m not really sure how your Russia example fits into this, but I doubt it really mattered to the Russians whether their overlords were Mongols or the Teutonic Order, it all comes down to the same thing in the end. But if what you’re saying were true you wouldn’t be seeing such an anti-Japanese backlash in the Koreas and China now either, would you – looks to me like the people there hate the Japanese and not the British or the Americans, and ther must be some historical reason for that don’t you think? A few factories won’t make up for the thousands of slaughtered civilians in Nanking and everywhere else, especially when those factories were geared to support Japanese military expansion in the first place.
August 19th, 2005 at 4:20 amExplanation gets longer about China and a Korean anti-Japan action.
However, do you trust an autocracy of communism and which democratic national remark?
Of course a communist country house is China and Korea. China is a nation killing 100,000,000 citizens of own country. China still invades Tibet. Besides, I hide it from a citizen of own country and agitate for an anti-Japan action. Korea is similar, too.
The Chinese government insists that 300,000 Chinese were killed in Nanjing great slaughter.
However, a group of foreigners who consisted of the European who stayed in Nanjing of those days reports population of Nanjing of those days with 200000 people. It is written down to a demand book when I requested food so that they protect Chinese refugees. Besides, when they investigated population one month after Nanjing occupation later, tens of thousands of people increase. This is not one-sided announcement of the Japanese armed forces. It is a report by the European who fought against Japan. This European writes that there was murder by a Japanese soldier. However, it was only the testimony that I heard from another person not what I watched by oneself. The European who was able to act freely in a small area such as Nanjing city never witnesses the killing spot. Said and witnessed killing once precisely. However, it was legal execution of a criminal. 300,000 bodies occur if they kill 300,000 human beings. However, the body would disappear where? A large quantity of bodies are not yet discovered. There is the testimony that I killed. However, there is not the person who looked at the place that buried the body at all for some reason. Did you burn it till you could write gasoline and completely became ash? A large quantity of gasoline should be necessary to completely make 300,000 bodies ash. Old Japan force which hardly had a truck would recruit you how? The Chinese government shows a large quantity of photographs as evidence of slaughter. However, it is proved that it has no weight of the evidence. The thing that the photographed time was more before it than Nanjing occupation. The thing which the equipment of the Japanese armed forces is wrong, and is completely a forgery. Though it is the depth of winters at the time of Nanjing occupation, the Japanese soldier who wore summer clothes is a thing coming out. A photograph appearing in Rape of Nanking which iris Chan wrote is similar. A photograph is a forgery, and it is proved that there is not weight of the evidence. Even if it is assumed that a killed human being was several thousand people, it will be difficult to cover the body with only period. If there were facilities such as Auschwitz, Nanjing was battle front somehow. There is tragedy for war. There would be the some violence and murder. I cannot doubt it. However, would there be really the organized slaughter?
A Korean woman was taken. The Korea government insists that a Korean woman was raped systematically.
However, testimony of the raped woman is strange. It is testimony of a certain woman. “I was taken at the age of 13 years old. I was raped in Indonesia by a Japanese soldier partner. A period is seven years. I was raped on the weekend by 100 people. “This is testimony of a woman of Chon-Soun. She died at 80 years old in 2004. Do not you feel doubt to see this? It is 80 years old in 2004. In other words she was born in 1924. It is 1937 at the age of 13 years old. However, it is 1941 that the Japanese armed forces make a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and caused war. It is 1942 that it struck Indonesia. I insist that she was taken to Indonesia for 1937 years, but a calculation does not match.
A woman of other rape victims does another testimony. Testimony of a woman of Fan-Kumju is individual. In “938, I was taken to 12 years old, Manchurian, and I was raped. “This which I am taken in a year of the” “Singapore fall that I am taken in” “1927 that I am taken at” “19 years old that I am taken at the age of 17 years old in” “1939, and was raped, and was raped, and was raped, and was raped (1944) is all Fan-Kumju and testimony of saying one woman. Can you believe their testimony? There is such a testimony in large quantities. However, the Korea government and mass communication insist on this with evidence and criticize Japan. It is the case that happened in Korea recently. A Korean fraud was arrested in Korea. He said to an old woman. Because I can receive money of compensation from the “Japan government, pay a request rate to me. “He who could receive money of a large amount of compensation if I did so it cheated an old man out of money. However, when it investigated the old man who paid the request charges, as for 80%, it became clear to be the false victim who quite had nothing to do with Japan. There is not the evidence that is a rape victim to remaining 20% either. It is a story of the old woman whom it depended on because it can receive money of compensation. It was reported that the film which photographed a cruel act of the Japanese armed forces was discovered just one week ago in Korea. However, as a result of having inspected it, as for the film, it is recognized that it was an anti-Japan propaganda movie made in China. Of course it is a fiction movie. Such a case occurs routinely in Korea. And an anti-Japan action intensifies if Japan is bad.
As for these Chinese and the Korean action, Japanese cannot do understanding.
China is an autocracy of communism.
South Korea is democratic, but it is the country which now the influence is strong, and stay in a clearly military autocracy 20 years ago.
Do you believe their claim?
August 19th, 2005 at 5:41 amA revision
Testimony of a Korean woman of Fan-Kumju.
In 1938, I was taken to 12 years old, Manchurian in China, and I was raped.
In 1939, I was taken at the age of 17 years old, and I was raped.
I was taken to a factory of the Japanese armed forces at the age of 17 years old, and I was raped.
I was taken at 19 years old, and I was raped.
I was taken in 1927, and I was raped.
I was taken in a year of the Singaporean fall, and I was raped. (1944) I was taken to Manchurian in China at the age of 14 years old, and I was raped.
There is it elsewhere.
All these testimony is woman one testimony of Fan-Kumju.
August 19th, 2005 at 6:03 amBoth the generation and age change whenever they testify.
Will there be a person trusting this?
The Japanese government which must negotiate against the Korea government which adopts such a testimony to be natural is troubled.
Mercy read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Japanese_war_atrocities
“the Japanese slaughtered as many as 30 million Filipinos, Malays, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Indonesians and Burmese, at least 23 million of them ethnic Chinese”
Mercy if you read sites like this you can see lists of Japanese war crimes. Compare that to the 500 year history of the US and the European colonisation that lead to the US. Even considering that the US is a famously aggressive and war-like nation, that has conquered nearly every piece of land it now occupies, and considering it is the only nation to have ever used atomic weapons, and considering it is the only nation (other than the UK) on Earth fight a war on every single populated continent, they have still killed fewer people in 500 years than the Japanese managed to do in less than 50 years at the beginning of the last century. Even considering Nazi Germany, no conquering nation has ever massacred foreign civilians and POWs like Japan has and no nation has been less apologetic about this fact. The proof is in the pudding: the nations you mentioned that the British and the US harmed have great relationships with them now. None of the nations that the Japanese brutally occupied have positive relationships with them, and only the Philipines has even a neutral relationship. (Of course Taiwan was never brutalised as the others were).
August 19th, 2005 at 6:06 amDon’t get me wrong, I love japan, but when the Japanese and the Japanese and their apologists try to white-wash their history I find it patently offensive and comparing to other injustices does not flatter Japan’s brutal history. In fact, it only shows how much more horrible Japan’s occupation was compared to other colonists.
August 19th, 2005 at 6:08 amDear Andrew.
You write that the Japanese armed forces slaughtered 30000000 people.
However, is it not to have had doubt toward the number? U.S.A. cast an atom bomb in Hiroshima and killed 140000 people. 215 atom bombs are necessary if they will kill 30000000 people. As for what kill 30000000 people, a number only for it is necessary for even the atom bomb which had the destructive power that す is strong because it is terrible work. Besides, the weapon of the Japanese armed forces was old. A main weapon is a rifle and a bayonet of a single-fire. How do you kill 30000000 people in spite of being the American armed forces and fight? And where did their dead body disappear?
Of course I know that there was a crime by some Japanese soldiers. It is left in an official record. I do not have mind to deny it at all. There was surely the crime. It was the crime that we should have hated. However, I cannot understand that it is said that there was a crime though there is not evidence. If there is a crime, evidence is left. If there is not a crime, evidence is not left. It will be extremely difficult that I hide evidence if there is great slaughter. However, a dead body is not found. There are not most of the children of mixed racial origins to a lot of testimony of a victim of a rape so that there is it. Why?
I watched Wiki. A different thing is written as a fact obviously.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nanjing_ditch.jpg
For example, this photograph is a typical propaganda photograph.
A Japanese soldier appearing in a photograph is different from a uniform of a Japanese soldier of those days. Positions of a rank chapter are different. Directions of a belt are different. It is only an officer that wear boots in the Japanese armed forces, but there is not the sword which an officer has by all means. (the sword was mounted the left of a waist with.) Shape of a helmet is different. A part called liner at the back of the head comes out, but this does not crop out because it is fixed with a helmet of the Japanese armed forces.
There are a lot of similar propaganda photographs, and scientific inspection is believed with there not being it. Why do all of you believe that it was forged clearly with a propaganda photograph becoming clear? A photograph of a dead body is shocking. But there is the evidence that they show the truth nowhere. Who photographed this photograph? Where was this photograph photographed? When was this photograph photographed? What was this photograph photographed for the purpose of? Does not the truth pass out of sight when confused by a shock?
Are not you confused by the government and propaganda such as China?
Do you believe that really truly mass communication and the government show?
Have you never had doubt after being born?
There was surely the crime.
August 19th, 2005 at 7:40 amBut were not there a lot of false accusations like a Palauan example, too?
The crime that there was accepts it.
However, the false accusation that there is not evidence is not accepted.
My grandfather was killed in action in Asia.
They who smile in a photograph cannot believe evaluation to be a criminal entirely.
I want to follow their dignity.
Dear Andrew.
I understand your feeling.
When a criminal justifies one’s act, we feel unpleasant.
But please think. Were all the Japanese criminals?
Japan has low crime rate. It was the same in Japan before half a century. The peace and order were very good, and there were not most of the cruel cases. However, will there be really that a Japanese transforms itself into the cruel devil at the moment when war occurred?
Will you please think about it?
August 19th, 2005 at 8:11 amMercy,
Perhaps it is a good time to point out that while maybe Japanese are law abiding people amongst themselves, when your ancestors decided to go on a colonial adventure they were not so kind to the other nations they conquered. You do a disservice to your nation by trying to make excuses. The people of the world, including the victims of your past imperial policies, would respect your nation far more if it just admitted the truth.
It is difficult to imagine that all these people from all these countries are telling lies to make your country look bad. Maybe some of the numbers are not correct, but terrible things happened. Your constant comparisons to the actions of other nations sound like a child, the complaints of a spoiled child that is. Everybody knows that the people of your country did terrible things, except for maybe the people that live in your country because many were never exposed to it and have a hard time believing it or even just accepting that you own people were capable of doing such things.
But bite the bullet and accept it. No matter how many contributions your nation made to other Asian countries, the terrible atrocities that were committed undermine all of it. Travel to some of those countries and talk to the people that experienced what your soldiers did and then ask them to their face why they are telling lies if you don’t believe them.
Give it a try.
August 20th, 2005 at 2:10 amDear Waygugin.
I understood your remark. However, do not you let some please argue?
A Japanese accepts a past crime.
For example, Japan apologizes to dozens of times formally for Asia. It is official. The prime minister visits each country and can apologize. Japan does compensation. Based on San Francisco peace treaty of 1951, Japan does payment of money of compensation, financial support, technical support in 25 countries.
I want you to watch the Japanese textbook and history book. A Japanese crime is written there. Aggression to Asia. Destruction. Sacrifice. Abuse to a captive. A march of death. Various things are written to the Japanese textbook and history book. You said. A Japanese does not know the crime that Japan violated? However, perhaps a Japanese knows many crimes almost as same as you. On the contrary, I want to ask you. Are abuse to Japan and Asia and aggression written to U.S.A. and a British textbook? Is it written about an unequal treaty concluded with Japan between U.S.A.? There is it much.
Do you think that Japan is born a grudge against from Asia? It is right. However, it is not right. The anti-Japan nation which there is in Asia is only 3 now. It is China, North Korea, south Korea. Please observe these three countries carefully. They are nations of communism. Korea is democratic, but it is anti-U.S.A. and anti-Japan. They are criticized as the country where there is not freedom of speech. China and Korea criticize Japan. Because the reason is because an approval rating of the government improves when they criticize Japan. When it is the time of election, their action becomes particularly active. When an approval rating of the current Korean President fell, they carried out criticism to Japan without grounds. As a result, the approval rating of the Korea government improved more than 20%. Will this be a normal nation? Do you believe their words?
Feelings to Japan of other Asian various countries are very good. The Japanese government and mass communication carried out a questionnaire. As a result, the country where he answered that Japan liked more than 80% of all inhabitants in each Asian country was the majority. Unfortunately (China and Korea are equal to or less than 20%.) The acquisition of a questionnaire is impossible in North Korea of a military autocracy ||). War was over. The Japanese government repaired it for each Asian country and promised. However, in Japan of those days, being defeated was shocked and was very poor. Therefore a Japanese minister visited Asia and asked for a reduction of money of compensation. As a result, many countries abandoned a right of compensation. In some countries such as India and Laos and Cambodia, the total amount abandoned money of compensation. They said to a Japanese minister to appeal to for a reduction of money of compensation.
“We do not demand compensation from Japan which contributed to independence of Asian various countries. ”
If Japan carried out only an atrocity for Asia, they make such a remark? Would they abandon a right of compensation?
Japan was saved by the abandonment of money of their compensation. Japan revived economically afterwards. Now Japan continues financial support and technical support in Asia to repay the favor. It is an action to repay a compensation and favor of a crime.
For example, by the Sumatra offing earthquake that occurred in 2004, Japan assisted a large amount most all over the world. And payment of the total amount was carried out immediately. There is the country which announced support elsewhere, but it is only Japan that paid the total amount immediately.
Does European and American mass communication report it about such Japanese apology and compensation and support?
August 20th, 2005 at 5:16 pmInternet is convenient. I can watch CNN and BBC. However, these are not reported. Only Japan and a German crime are reported. I cannot do understanding. Even if Japan and Germany do apology and compensation, will it be a criminal eternally?
ok- this iz a tough read but i stuck w/it…i got the first part tho…and i will attest 2 systematic rape that waz committed by the american soldierz…they evn molested the animalz in azia undr the dirty influence of alcohol…the poor animalz will nvr get reparationz…this went on all the way thru the 80z-n-some change…yep itz true..the australian squidz were no bettr…they tore thru tokyo in the 80z actin a opediphile…they did some heinous actz to 14-yr old military bratz (so much 4 alliez)…on the othr hand…the japaneze were tryin 2 slaughtr az many islandrz-n-chineze az they could jus like the UK tried 2 annihlate all the australianz…this iz not a lie gang…the author iz on hit 4 the partz i can understand…i also got a chance 2 visit south korea…i can remembr the hatred 4 the japaneze bcuz of the way history went down…unfortunately- only my mom got 2 see china…i wish i could have gone…i hear itz so clean- evn the dirt iz swept neat…
November 16th, 2005 at 10:03 ameven i have to admit.. i always thought my country did a favor when they colonized asian countries.. but now i realize how Japan is so sinful and henious in their crimes. We never learned this in school,but taught that we didn’t do anything wrong. I realized that my country is totally wrong
May 21st, 2006 at 1:46 pmDear Mercy,
As you might not be eager to accept historical facts from foreign (wetsern) sources, you might be interested in stories coming from the Japanese veterans themseleves: http://www.geocities.com/nankingatrocities/Confession/confession_02.htm .
May 27th, 2006 at 4:53 am