Are You a Safety Driver?

Let\'s Safety Drive

Jiji reports that a woman, 20, in Chiba Prefecture, has been arrested for running into a group of six elementary school children with her car.

No worries - the kids were taken to hospital with “non-life threatening injuries” - but the driver may be charged with professional negligience causing injury.

Having lived in North America for more than a year now, I can’t really say that this is a case of a typically terrible Japanese driver getting her just rewards, because here in Canada, in a land where 15 year olds are licensed to drive (albeit as “learners”) and most men aspire to drive a 3-ton “light truck”, the roads are just as terrifying as the narrow, crowded streets of Japan.

Instead, the story is a case in point of the difference between Japanese and Western attitudes towards driving and driver responsibility.

Basically, in Japan, if a driver is involved in an accident with a pedestrian, a bicyclist or motorcyclist, the driver is 100% at fault, no matter what.

This may seem outrageous, especially if you’ve ever watched school children returning home from school; there’s all sorts of horseplay involved - little children in yellow hats and clunky red backpacks chasing each other and darting onto the road. It’s not unlikely that the hapless Chiba driver was in the wrong place at the wrong time - that’s why it’s called an “accident.” But let’s face it: in the eyes of a foreign driver, pedestrians and bicyclists do all sorts of stupid things in Japan.Chibi Cops

They run out into traffic and wear dark clothing at night, and bicyclists in particular have the annoying habit of reading manga, smoking cigarettes and drinking canned coffee, all while holding an umbrella and punching in email on a cellphone as they navigate a snow-bound Japanese road constricted down to a single lane because of snow banks and illegally parked cars.

In Japan, pedestrians, bicyclists and other non-drivers are not responsible for their own safety - motorists are.

And why not? Traffic accidents are the leading cause of death for children in industrialized countries. Anything that forces motorists to drive more carefully has got to be a good thing, and I wish Canada would adopt the same sorts of laws.

Stupid bicyclists and clued-out pedestrians were with us long before motorcars, so if you’re prepared to turn the key in the ignition of a giant lump of metal in Japan, you should be prepared to pay the price.

Too bad about the Chiba driver’s future career prospects, but let’s hope the kids are okay.

7 Responses to “Are You a Safety Driver?”

John Thacker Said:

Anything that forces motorists to drive more carefully has got to be a good thing,

This reminds me of comments by economists that increased safety devices, like seatbelts and airbags, tend to cause motorists to drive less carefully in consequence. (This fact is well studied.) While the safety devices means that as far as car-to-car collisions go, the total number of passenger and driver injuries and fatalities is reduced, the net effect for pedestrians and cyclists is more injuries and deaths, since seat belts and airbags don’t make them any safer, even as they encourage riskier driving.

The economists have gone on to suggest that if you really want to force motorists to drive more safely, instead of safety devices there should be a spear mounted on the steering wheel, pointed at the driver’s chest. That would certainly be something “that forces motorists to drive more carefully” and hence would be a good thing.

aburioe Said:

It’s funny that you say that Japanese motorists are always at fault when hitting pedestrians, motorcyclists, etc. I was riding a motorcycle in Kanagawa and got hit by a car (who pulled out in front of me), and when the police got there, he went on and on and on about how he was completely, 100% at fault for the whole episode. He even volunteered to drive me to the hospital. He was a great guy, it turned out.

He went above and beyond taking responsibility for it, and I appreciated it. I guess this attitude you’re referring to helps explains the willingness to take responsibility. Good on Japan, I guess.

Yzabel Said:

It goes the same in France, the driver is always 100% responsible–we need to be in control of our vehicles all the time, period. From this also depends, in an accident, where your car got hit. If it’s on the front, you’re entirely at fault, since you “could have” avoided he accident. However, I’m not sure that this law has ever prevented people to drive the wrong way. When I need to go somewhere by foot, I’m always extra careful, since I know that if I’m not, well, drivers won’t necessarily be for me.

Its a tad bit hypocrytical, though. Last winter, I almost hit a motorcyclist. He was running in the middle of “my” lane, at night, without lights on, in a nasty turn of the street. Hadn’t I made my car jump on the pavement to avoid him (lucky in this that there wasn’t a car parked on it, as the inhabitants nearby usually do), he’d have landed on it. Too bad for me that when it comes to Law, I’d have been deemed responsible had I hit him. Tough.

Duo Said:

Well it sure beats China where it’s always the pedestrain’s fault apparently. So, it always pays to move in herds of fellow villagers in case you come under attack by an apparatchik driver you can at least resort to an angry mob action.

Personally I think there should be limits to the “driver always responsible” rule - Yzabel’s case in point - it would be so blatantly obvious who’s fault it was there that it shouldn’t even be a contest (opposite lane, at night, no lights??) There’s only so much you can do to avoid the stupidity of others and painting the law in such broad strokes is just unfair. Or maybe all the jaywalking cattle I keep seeing downtown Chicago is finally starting to miff me off!

Ampontan Said:

Moreso than grade school kids, the big danger on Japanese roads is high school kids. They’re on bicycles, and of course 16 and 17 year olds like to go fast and seldom pay attention to what’s around the corner.

The only time I’ve felt like doing bodily harm in Japan has been in these situations.

In South Korea, on the other hand, pedestrians better watch out.

Factory Said:

Hmm the motivation for pedestrians and bicyclists for behaving safely on the road is that they will generally come off worse in any accident than a car driver would. A conviction for traffic offences is a minor thing compared to half a ton of 60km/h metal charging through ones spleen.

papa Said:

In the U.S., also, although traffic laws vary from state to state, the rule of the motorist always being in the wrong in any collision with a pedestrian or bicylist is universal.

Leave a Reply

Design: Dao By Design | Powered by WordPress