Masako book
02/15/2007 @ 4:00 pm
It has been reported all over the news today, about Ben Hills, who recently wrote a book about Princess Masako and her life in the Imperial family. One Japan-based reporter who was misquoted in the book, along with others, apparently, wrote this open letter about the issue back in December.
There is a current interview with Hills today in Australia here.
Apparently, Hills was visited personally in Australia by a delegation from the Japanese government! Not just the official Australian government people, and ministries, but the author himself got paid a visit! OUCH!
February 15th, 2007 at 3:41 pmInteresting, this. I’d be delighted if I was Mr Hills. Japanese translation coming out in about a fortnight, and the book’s headline news. Couldn’t wish for better publicity. And full of lies, gossip and half-truths? It’ll fly off the shelves.
February 15th, 2007 at 3:42 pmI love this quote from the interview…
February 15th, 2007 at 3:46 pmI think that Ben Hills was the correspondent for either the Orstralian Financial Review or Lord Rupert of Wapping’s – “Australian”.
(I believe he is married to a Japanese lady).
He/she.. has a chip on his shoulder and an axe to grind.
or just short of dosh.
but then I’m sure that berocca or the Irony Chef can put me straight on that one.
I heard his radio interview this morning – netwise.
appalling.
February 15th, 2007 at 3:54 pmOne thing to note: the book was published by RANDOM HOUSE AUSTRALIA, and not in New York yet. Just Australia. News reports say the English edition of the book is now the number one top selling foreign book on amazon.com Japan’s foreign book list.
Hills works for the Sydney Morning Herald, “from his bolthole in Byron Bay”, whatever that means…..
Google has 143 references to this story as of now. This story has legs. Expect big write up in TIME ASIA next Monday and NEWSWEEK ASIA too. It’s going everywhere: BBC, CNN, AP, Reuters, the wire services, Kyodo…..
Hills will probably end up as a persona non grata in Japan after this…..
February 15th, 2007 at 4:03 pmpulp fiction methinks….:roll:
stop – me-go-beer-now!! – (byeeeeee.)
remora.
February 15th, 2007 at 4:18 pmI think what this story really needs is a bizarre twist. Maybe the Imperial Household Agency should spin that Princess Masako once spurned Hills’ advances and that’s why he wrote the book, out of spite. That would be the smart thing to do, not counter-productive actions that will have Random House’s PR people salivating over all this free publicity.
It just needs a few ‘rumours on the internet’ to get it going. There, I started it. Can I have my yen and a rub-down from a civil servant of my choosing now, please?
February 15th, 2007 at 7:53 pmFrom Ben Hills website:
On February 13, 2007, the Japanese Foreign Ministry called a Press conference in Tokyo to denounce the book as “insulting to the Japanese people and the Imperial family.” They made no specific claims of factual inaccuracy, and contented themselves with deeply inscrutable statements such as saying that the book contains “..disrespectful descriptions, distortions of facts, and judgemental assertions with audacious conjectures and coarse logic.”
With my publisher in Australia, Random House, we stand by the accuracy of the book, and have told the Japanese government that there will be no apology. I reminded the representative of the Japanese Ambassador in Australia, Hideaki Ueda, that this country is proud of its long tradition of free speech, and will resist any attempt by government – particularly a foreign government – to censor or suppress information to which its citizens are entitled.
For four months the book has been on sale in Australia and the US without a word from the Japanese government. Now, however, Kodansha plans to publish it in Japanese in Japan, so that for the first time Japanese people will be able to understand how their Crown Princess has been persecuted by the Imperial Household bureaucrats, and driven into a state of deep depression. It is blatantly obvious that the government is trying to prevent this happening, but Kodansha has said that it will not be bullied, and plans to publish regardless, in March.
As far as I am concerned, the only apology that is due is that the Imperial Household Agency should get down on its knees and apologise to Princess Masako for its treatment of her.
February 15th, 2007 at 8:31 pmI agree Hills is in a world of trouble if this story continues traveling as it has.
My problem with this is that, having not read it yet, I wonder if it was really necessary to write in the first place.
Some stories are told because they are good stories, some are told because they should be. But I strongly believe that some things do not need to be told or written. Is this book one of them? I can’t answer that.
February 15th, 2007 at 11:54 pmI think it’s great that the book was published, though I’m kind of shocked that it will be released in Japan. Here in NYÇ it has prominent placement in the Barnes and Noble window in Union Square.
The publication of this book kind of reminds me of a cross between the Andrew Morton Diana book and the Bix book on Hirohito. The fallout will be interesting.
Thanks for posting, Danny. This is a very interesting story and I’m keen to see how it develops.
“But I strongly believe that some things do not need to be told or written. Is this book one of them? I can’t answer that.”
The older I get, the more I think we really do have to let all stories be told. This doesn’t mean we are comfortable with them all (witness my outburst a month ago or so), but I think it’s usually more important to tell a story than not to–in the long run. We owe a debt to the men and women who put pen to paper thousands of years ago to leave us just a scrap of their daily lives so we have different view points of history. It’d be terrible if all we were ever handed was the “official” version of history. Thank goodness for graffiti, shopping lists and even trashy books. They all do reflect the culture and what is going on in people’s minds, whether we like it or not.
February 16th, 2007 at 12:45 am[...] Whoops, an Aussie author has annoyed the Japanese government with his book about the alleged treatment of Princess Masako. Apparently, the Japanese goverment didn’t compain much, until it looked like the book was going to be published in Japan. So, the government thought it would try to influence the publisher in not going ahead. Hmmm, seems to have backfired, as now this story is all over the news and the PR people for the publisher and author must be rubbing their hands with glee. [...]
February 16th, 2007 at 1:11 amwell… I could probably get in trouble for talking about this…
but people are NOT terribly happy here at the Embassy. The ‘minister-cousellor’ mentioned by Mr Hills has an understandable headache. The sad fact is that writing the letter and presenting it in person to this guy has only generated insane amounts of publicity for the book, thereby having the opposite effect to what the Imperial Houshold Agency wanted.
I mean, doesn’t someone think these things through? I know it doesn’t happen here at the Embassy, once an order comes through from Tokyo, it is to be obeyed and pity the fool who puts their hand up to say “wait a minute.. maybe this isn’t such a great idea”.
I’ll try an get a copy of the letter, but this is not considered a ‘political’ issue. I will have to visit the ‘cultural’ section.
February 16th, 2007 at 6:52 amUPDATE: Japanese edition is on hold: UPDATE TWO: No, pub date is set for March 16 now as per contract with Hills.
A Japanese edition of the book…. has been postponed after the Imperial Household Agency posted a complaint on it website.
“We are studying the facts and content of the book,” said a spokesman for Japanese publishers Kodansha. He said the book’s publication, scheduled for this month, could depend on the response to demands for apologies and corrections.
“If the book is published (in Japanese) as an exact translation of the original book, we are not happy at all,” Ministry of Foreign affairs chief spokesman Mitsuo Sakaba said yesterday.
February 16th, 2007 at 12:19 pmIt’s hard to muster any sympathy for Masako. After all, her education was financed by Daddy’s salary from Chisso, the company which dumped mercury into Minamata Bay and caused the agonizing deaths and cripplings of thousands – the Minamata disaster.
And after Chisso was found to be at fault, what did Masako’s Daddy’s company do? It hired yakuza to viciously attack the victims and their advocates, including a famous American photojournalist, who produced a heart-breaking book of photographs of the victims.
The spawn of an industrial criminal marrying the spawn of a war criminal: that’s Masako and Naruhito.
February 16th, 2007 at 12:53 pmouch
February 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pm“As far as I am concerned, the only apology that is due is that the Imperial Household Agency should get down on its knees and apologise to Princess Masako for its treatment of her.”
Errr.. Who does he think he is? How could an un-known Australian get sources close to the imperial family…Can he even speak Japanese? It seems like another anti-Japan propaganda book written by a righteous foreigner.
February 16th, 2007 at 7:43 pmlacadutadegiganti:
The spawn of an industrial criminal marrying the spawn of a war criminal: that’s Masako and Naruhito.
wow. There are so many things wrong with this statement its hard to even know where to begin. Ok first point would be that you believe Children are guilty of the crimes their parents commit? That is so ridiculous it’s not even funny. It’s quite easy to take a cheap shot at someone whose lived in money and makes me think that you don’t have any and couldn’t begin to understand the social pressure she had to live with in those circumstances. Social pressure in the form of her having to ACCEPT the marriage proposal from the Prince even though she didn’t love him. Again, something you’ll never understand.
Second, Hirohito was not a war criminal. The America Forces never said he was a War Criminal and never charged him as a war criminal. And suddenly now YOU know something they didn’t? Oh please… Crawl back into your cave. Showa Teno was a pawn of a military cue in the government and is another sad story to be told…
Both these stories are sad because that is life in Japan. And its NOT ok to attack people because of other peoples mistakes. But then again, you feel kids are responsible for parent’s errors so what can we really say about that…
February 16th, 2007 at 11:16 pmUPDATE: Kodanska caved into pressure from J-govt and foreign ministry and Imperial family, and will not publish book on March 16, as contracted to. But news tippers say that another publisher in Tokyo has come forward and hopes to get book out in Japanese ASAP.
February 17th, 2007 at 6:27 pmfirst point would be that you believe Children are guilty of the crimes their parents commit?
There’s been a pretty resounding ‘yes’ on that one from the global community throughout the second half of the 20th century, be it accountability for slavery, the murder of aboriginal people, the list goes on.
Second, Hirohito was not a war criminal. The America Forces never said he was a War Criminal and never charged him as a war criminal.
Who cares what the American forces did? What the war crimes tribunal did matters, and as Abe pointed out, what they said doesn’t matter since no existing domestic laws were broken.
Crawl back into your cave. Showa Teno was a pawn of a military cue in the government and is another sad story to be told…
I really hope you’re joking.
February 18th, 2007 at 12:13 pmThere’s been a pretty resounding ‘yes’ on that one from the global community throughout the second half of the 20th century, be it accountability for slavery, the murder of aboriginal people, the list goes on.
I have not seen one case that would support that. If you could link to something that proves that perhaps that would help.
About Hirohito being a pawn, I truly do believe that. I think Hirohito had more power then even he realized. Could he have prevented the war if he saw fit? Absolutely. But as well, Hirohito was an emperor who wanted nothing to do with being an emperor. He was a scientist and researcher at heart. The man didn’t even know what the hell was going on, in my opinion, in the war situation as his military commanders did.
There is no doubt in my mind that Hirohito was a tool used by extremists to control a nation.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:46 pmthe conversation has moved over here
February 19th, 2007 at 11:08 amI think for the most part, you all have lost the plot. First off, in no way should this book have ever been written. It is an out right attack on the Royal Family and I resent the fact that you people find it to be interesting.
Ben Hill has crossed the line with this one and I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some retribution sought out on his behalf from the Right.
The last politician who spoke out against the royal family had it in for himself.
February 19th, 2007 at 11:37 amBeroca — Did you ever get your hands on the letter?
February 22nd, 2007 at 1:26 amOne Japan-based reporter who was misquoted in the book, along with others, apparently, wrote this open letter about the issue back in December.
In preparation for a final word on this book and on Mr. Hills, I just tried to check out the open letter at the other end of the link provided to find out that it has been replaced with the following statement.
March 15th, 2007 at 10:48 pm[...] past JAPUNDIT reports on this book and the ensuing brouhaha here, here, here, and here. Share [...]
August 3rd, 2007 at 12:10 pm